Current:Home > InvestJohnathan Walker:Environmentalists say Pearl River flood control plan would be destructive. Alternative plans exist -PrimeFinance
Johnathan Walker:Environmentalists say Pearl River flood control plan would be destructive. Alternative plans exist
Fastexy Exchange View
Date:2025-04-10 05:14:44
JACKSON,Johnathan Walker Miss. (AP) — Environmental groups in Mississippi presented findings Wednesday from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers showing a long-debated flood control project along the Pearl River would be “destructive,” and the groups said alternative projects should be considered instead.
But proponents of the plan say the documents were improperly released, incomplete and contained information that could be misleading.
The dispute is the latest battle over the One Lake project, which was first proposed years ago to mitigate flooding in the capital city of Jackson and surrounding areas. Opponents said the project is motivated by commercial interests and would harm the environment.
“At the core, One Lake is a private real estate development scheme masquerading as flood control for greater Jackson,” said Jill Mastrototaro, the Audubon Delta’s policy director.
Documents obtained through a public records request by the environmental groups show alternative plans that could be smaller and less costly, members of the Audubon Delta and Sierra Club said at a news conference. The conservation groups outlined an internal Army Corps of Engineers presentation from August, which analyzed the financial and environmental impacts of the One Lake plan and potential alternatives.
The One Lake plan involves dredging and excavation of the Pearl River to widen, deepen and straighten portions of the waterway and reinforce the existing levee system. It could cost between $1.4 billion and $2.2 billion, but proponents say those figures might be inflated. Critics and proponents both say this could lead to commercial development by the new lake.
Environmental groups say the plan would destroy 2,000 acres (809.4 hectares) of wetland habitats and raise water levels by as much as 8 feet (2.4 meters) in some areas. That could increase tributary flooding and, according to the Corps’ presentation, “induce flooding on approximately 230 structures” in the area.
An alternative plan outlined in the presentation would not make structural changes and would cost $199 million, according to the environmental groups. It would elevate and floodproof about 600 structures in the Jackson area without dredging parts of the Pearl River and would not induce any flooding.
In a statement responding to the environmental groups, Keith Turner, an attorney representing the Rankin Hinds Pearl River Flood and Drainage Control District, a flood control board that supports the project, said the documents represent an earlier draft of the plan. He said that the proposed alternative could also be damaging and costly.
“This alternative would either remove people’s homes and neighborhoods or require their homes to be raised off the ground,” Turner said. “They also ignore the downtown Jackson flooding that will continue under a nonstructural alternative.”
The Army Corps of Engineers is set to continue reviewing the project’s environmental impacts in 2024.
In 2020 and 2022, the Peal River flooded parts of Jackson.
Environmental groups and cities downstream from Jackson have argued the project would result in unacceptable environmental harm, such as the destruction of wildlife habitat and wetlands, and a decrease in water flow.
Louisiana officials have said they fear a dearth of freshwater would alter the salinity of wetlands, could hurt native species and could affect industrial discharge by providing too little water to dilute chemicals.
___
Michael Goldberg is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Follow him at @mikergoldberg.
veryGood! (62649)
Related
- Can Bill Belichick turn North Carolina into a winner? At 72, he's chasing one last high
- Meet Grace Beyer, the small-school scoring phenom Iowa star Caitlin Clark might never catch
- U.S. Army restores honor to Black soldiers hanged in Jim Crow-era South
- US Rep. Andy Kim sues over what he calls New Jersey’s ‘cynically manipulated’ ballot system
- Sam Taylor
- Independent Spirit Awards 2024: 'Past Lives,' 'American Fiction' and 'The Holdovers' take home top honors
- Mother of missing Wisconsin boy, man her son was staying with charged with child neglect
- Ricki Lake Reveals Body Transformation After 30-Pound Weight Loss
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- This teenager was struggling to find size 23 shoes to wear. Shaq came to his rescue.
Ranking
- 'As foretold in the prophecy': Elon Musk and internet react as Tesla stock hits $420 all
- Jennifer Aniston Proves Her Workout Routine Is Anything But Easy
- Donald Trump appeals $454 million judgment in New York civil fraud case
- Firefighters needed so much water that a Minnesota town’s people were asked to go without
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Consumers are increasingly pushing back against price increases — and winning
- What time do Michigan polls open and close for the 2024 primary? Key voting hours to know
- Alec Baldwin to stand trial this summer on a charge stemming from deadly ‘Rust’ movie set shooting
Recommendation
Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
Delaware’s early voting and permanent absentee laws are unconstitutional, a judge says
Three-man, one-woman crew flies to Florida to prep for Friday launch to space station
Bye-bye, birdie: Maine’s chickadee makes way for star, pine tree on new license plate
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
Jennifer Aniston Proves Her Workout Routine Is Anything But Easy
Priyanka Chopra Embraces Her Fresh Faced Skin in Makeup-Free Selfie
Why Martha Stewart Says She Doesn't Wear Underwear